Norwegian vs Celtic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,480,701 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 4.7 Celtics.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 6.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $50,447, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,866 compared to $92,241, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $60,608, a difference of 0.82%), median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $38,283, a difference of 1.3%), and per capita income ($44,480 compared to $43,621, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.6%), family poverty (6.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 28.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 4.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (14.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 21.1%), and female unemployment (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 13.5%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.19%), average family size (3.08 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.0%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 25.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 21.1%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.6%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 0.16%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.90%).