Ute vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Celtics

Fair
Average
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,971,294 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Celtics.
Ute Integration in Celtic Communities

Ute vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $43,621, a difference of 19.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $98,896, a difference of 17.8%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $101,139, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $50,447, a difference of 0.90%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $38,283, a difference of 9.5%).
Ute vs Celtic Income
Income MetricUteCeltic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
27.3%

Ute vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 44.8%), poverty (16.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 37.3%), and family poverty (12.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.14%), single male poverty (15.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and single mother poverty (35.7% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 15.4%).
Ute vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricUteCeltic
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Excellent
10.9%

Ute vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 39.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 36.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.93%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.8%).
Ute vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteCeltic
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.4%

Ute vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 4.8%).
Ute vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Tragic
81.8%

Ute vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.2%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.11, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 0.88%), family households (64.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.89%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.4%).
Ute vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteCeltic
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Poor
33.3%

Ute vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 43.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.6%).
Ute vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
7.1%

Ute vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.5%), master's degree (11.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 25.9%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Ute vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricUteCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
1.9%

Ute vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 94.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.36%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.78%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Ute vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricUteCeltic
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%