Swedish vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Swedish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Swedes

Celtics

Excellent
Average
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Swedish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,900,344 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 6.9 Celtics.
Swedish Integration in Celtic Communities

Swedish vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 7.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,377 compared to $98,896, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,136 compared to $92,241, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,421 compared to $38,283, a difference of 3.0%), householder income over 65 years ($62,736 compared to $60,608, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($47,851 compared to $45,732, a difference of 4.6%).
Swedish vs Celtic Income
Income MetricSwedishCeltic
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,750
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,499
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,524
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,851
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,445
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,421
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,986
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,136
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,377
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,736
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.4%
Tragic
27.3%

Swedish vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 24.0%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.9%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 7.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 8.8%).
Swedish vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricSwedishCeltic
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Average
12.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Good
8.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.4%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Excellent
10.9%

Swedish vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.4%).
Swedish vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSwedishCeltic
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.4%

Swedish vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Swedish vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSwedishCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
44.1%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.8%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
81.8%

Swedish vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 12.3%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.10 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.40%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and family households (64.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Swedish vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSwedishCeltic
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.7%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.0%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Poor
33.3%

Swedish vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 18.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 6.1%).
Swedish vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSwedishCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.8%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.1%

Swedish vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 16.1%), associate's degree (48.4% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and bachelor's degree (39.1% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
Swedish vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricSwedishCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.8%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.7%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
39.1%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Good
15.2%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Good
1.9%

Swedish vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.90%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.4%).
Swedish vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricSwedishCeltic
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%