Chickasaw vs Celtic Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Celtic
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Celtics
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Celtic Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,461,279 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 50.1 Celtics.
![Chickasaw Integration in Celtic Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-celtics/chickasaw-vs-celtics-community-integration.webp)
Chickasaw vs Celtic Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $98,896, a difference of 20.3%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $43,621, a difference of 19.6%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,193, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.37%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,283, a difference of 11.2%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $45,732, a difference of 12.4%).
![Chickasaw vs Celtic Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-celtics/chickasaw-vs-celtics-income.webp)
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Celtic |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Average $43,621 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Fair $101,139 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Fair $83,193 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Fair $45,732 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Average $54,242 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $38,283 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,447 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Fair $92,241 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Fair $98,896 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Average $60,608 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.3% |
Chickasaw vs Celtic Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 22.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 21.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.8%).
![Chickasaw vs Celtic Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-celtics/chickasaw-vs-celtics-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Celtic |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Poor 17.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Fair 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Average 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Fair 17.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 10.9% |
Chickasaw vs Celtic Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
![Chickasaw vs Celtic Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-celtics/chickasaw-vs-celtics-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Celtic |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Good 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Good 5.4% |
Chickasaw vs Celtic Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
![Chickasaw vs Celtic Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-celtics/chickasaw-vs-celtics-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Celtic |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 63.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.8% |
Chickasaw vs Celtic Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.99%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.6%).
![Chickasaw vs Celtic Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-celtics/chickasaw-vs-celtics-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Celtic |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Excellent 47.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Poor 33.3% |
Chickasaw vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.9%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.19%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
![Chickasaw vs Celtic Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-celtics/chickasaw-vs-celtics-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Celtic |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Chickasaw vs Celtic Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 29.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%).
![Chickasaw vs Celtic Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-celtics/chickasaw-vs-celtics-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Celtic |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Good 65.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Average 14.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.9% |
Chickasaw vs Celtic Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 32.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 4.0%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 8.4%).
![Chickasaw vs Celtic Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-celtics/chickasaw-vs-celtics-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Celtic |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 13.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Average 47.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Good 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |