Kiowa vs Celtic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,188,875 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.825. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.268% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to an increase of 268.2 Celtics.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $98,896, a difference of 32.2%), median household income ($65,914 compared to $83,193, a difference of 26.2%), and median family income ($80,885 compared to $101,139, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $38,283, a difference of 12.3%), householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $50,447, a difference of 12.8%), and wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 39.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 39.2%), and family poverty (12.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.9%), single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and single female poverty (26.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 43.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 29.5%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (61.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.11, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 42.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.4%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 36.2%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 35.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 35.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.5%), cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.4%).