Malaysian vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Malaysians

Celtics

Fair
Average
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Malaysian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,845,641 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 29.0 Celtics.
Malaysian Integration in Celtic Communities

Malaysian vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,194 compared to $43,621, a difference of 11.3%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $54,242, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $50,447, a difference of 2.3%), median household income ($81,064 compared to $83,193, a difference of 2.6%), and median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $38,283, a difference of 2.6%).
Malaysian vs Celtic Income
Income MetricMalaysianCeltic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,194
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,230
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,064
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,844
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,772
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,298
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,615
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,291
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,517
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,244
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Tragic
27.3%

Malaysian vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 23.7%), receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 16.3%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.5%), single female poverty (22.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Malaysian vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricMalaysianCeltic
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Average
12.3%
Families
Poor
9.6%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.4%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.2%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.7%
Excellent
10.9%

Malaysian vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.68%).
Malaysian vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMalaysianCeltic
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Poor
8.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Good
5.4%

Malaysian vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
Malaysian vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMalaysianCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.5%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.7%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
81.8%

Malaysian vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.1%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.3%).
Malaysian vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMalaysianCeltic
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.31
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Poor
45.9%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.9%
Poor
33.3%

Malaysian vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.1%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.24%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.4%).
Malaysian vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMalaysianCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.1%

Malaysian vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 69.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.5%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Malaysian vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricMalaysianCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.2%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.2%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.6%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.9%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.0%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Malaysian vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 29.5%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and male disability (11.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.71%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.5%).
Malaysian vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricMalaysianCeltic
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%