Immigrants from Grenada vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Grenada
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Grenada

Celtics

Poor
Average
1,656
SOCIAL INDEX
14.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
293rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Grenada Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,463,538 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.169% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 169.1 Celtics.
Immigrants from Grenada Integration in Celtic Communities

Immigrants from Grenada vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 68.6%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $60,608, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $98,896, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,596 compared to $45,732, a difference of 0.30%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,311 compared to $92,241, a difference of 4.4%), and per capita income ($41,123 compared to $43,621, a difference of 6.1%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Celtic Income
Income MetricImmigrants from GrenadaCeltic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,123
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Tragic
$89,249
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,517
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,596
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,279
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,932
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,538
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,311
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$85,552
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,747
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 62.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 62.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 61.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from GrenadaCeltic
Poverty
Tragic
15.8%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
12.4%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.7%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.7%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.8%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 51.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 46.4%), and unemployment (6.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.2%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from GrenadaCeltic
Unemployment
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
25.7%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 62.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.69%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from GrenadaCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
67.2%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.8%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.3%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
81.8%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 32.9%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 26.2%), and currently married (39.1% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.11, a difference of 7.3%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from GrenadaCeltic
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.5%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.2%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.1%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 364.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 159.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 138.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 46.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 106.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 138.4%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from GrenadaCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
37.5%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
28.7%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 68.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.6%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from GrenadaCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.6%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.1%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.4%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.6%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.0%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 77.3%), hearing disability (2.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 69.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from GrenadaCeltic
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Fair
12.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.94%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.8%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
47.9%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.6%