Guatemalan vs Celtic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,556,905 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.528. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 4.7 Celtics.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 20.5%), median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $54,242, a difference of 16.1%), and per capita income ($37,766 compared to $43,621, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $50,447, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $38,283, a difference of 7.2%), and median household income ($75,961 compared to $83,193, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 47.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 37.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 4.3%), single female poverty (23.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.3%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.9%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.3%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 36.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 111.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.6%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 36.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 32.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.58%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.5%).