Immigrants from Oceania vs Celtic Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Celtic
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Celtics
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,274,533 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.769. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.076% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 76.4 Celtics.
Immigrants from Oceania vs Celtic Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,100 compared to $83,193, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $50,447, a difference of 6.4%), and wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $54,242, a difference of 2.7%), per capita income ($45,220 compared to $43,621, a difference of 3.7%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $45,732, a difference of 4.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Celtic |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,220 | Average $43,621 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,453 | Fair $101,139 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,100 | Fair $83,193 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,617 | Fair $45,732 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,712 | Average $54,242 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,297 | Tragic $38,283 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,680 | Tragic $50,447 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,623 | Fair $92,241 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,705 | Fair $98,896 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,416 | Average $60,608 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.6% | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Celtic Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.7%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.25%), poverty (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and female poverty (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.97%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Celtic |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Good 8.7% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Tragic 14.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Poor 17.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Fair 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Average 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Fair 17.0% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Tragic 30.9% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Celtic Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Celtic |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Good 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Tragic 8.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Celtic Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Celtic |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 63.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.9% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 81.8% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Celtic Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 8.9%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.11, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.85%), family households (64.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Celtic |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 63.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Excellent 47.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Tragic 13.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.63%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Celtic |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Exceptional 8.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Exceptional 92.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Celtic Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.5%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and high school diploma (88.8% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (59.4% compared to 59.4%, a difference of 0.060%), associate's degree (45.8% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.57%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Celtic |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Exceptional 93.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Exceptional 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Good 65.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Average 14.8% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Good 1.9% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Celtic Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.1%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Celtic |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 13.0% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Average 47.2% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Good 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |