Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Celtic
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Celtics
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Cuba Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,293,081 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.417. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Celtics.
Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $60,608, a difference of 35.5%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $101,139, a difference of 29.2%), and per capita income ($34,910 compared to $43,621, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $50,447, a difference of 0.14%), median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $38,283, a difference of 15.0%), and median earnings ($38,426 compared to $45,732, a difference of 19.0%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Celtic |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $34,910 | Average $43,621 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $78,249 | Fair $101,139 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $68,461 | Fair $83,193 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,426 | Fair $45,732 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $43,461 | Average $54,242 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,291 | Tragic $38,283 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,374 | Tragic $50,447 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $76,701 | Fair $92,241 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $80,662 | Fair $98,896 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,735 | Average $60,608 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 90.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 82.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 80.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 2.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 7.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Celtic |
Poverty | Tragic 14.6% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 11.3% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.1% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.9% | Poor 17.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Fair 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Average 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Fair 17.0% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Fair 21.2% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.4% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.1% | Tragic 30.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 20.8% | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Celtic |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.6% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Good 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.9% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 8.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 36.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Celtic |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 63.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.0% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.2% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Tragic 81.8% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 24.5%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.63%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.8%), and family households (68.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 7.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Celtic |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.2% | Tragic 63.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.2% | Excellent 47.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.26 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.5% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.7% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 41.5% | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.85%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Celtic |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 92.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.3% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 72.8%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 60.2%), and master's degree (10.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Celtic |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 93.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.5% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.2% | Exceptional 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 55.7% | Good 65.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.7% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.5% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.3% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.9% | Average 14.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Good 1.9% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Celtic Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 46.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 41.9%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.95%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Celtic |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.0% |
Females | Fair 12.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.7% | Average 47.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.3% | Good 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |