Pima vs Celtic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,816,193 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.992. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 59.6 Celtics.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $43,621, a difference of 42.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $98,896, a difference of 34.8%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $83,193, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,447, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $38,283, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $92,241, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 138.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 116.7%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 108.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 24.7%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 25.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 152.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 116.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 99.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 79.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 54.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.54%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 75.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 59.6%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 59.5%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 59.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 57.7%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.26%), male disability (12.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.7%).