Thai vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Thai
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Thais
Chinese
17.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Thai vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,874,007 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015 and weighted average of 17.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 7.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Thai | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 44.0% | 43.0% |
| Range | 41.7% | 41.7% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 16.1% |
| Median | 13.9% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Thais and Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Immigrants from Iran (17.5%, a difference of 0.99%), Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 1.7%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 1.9%), Bhutanese (17.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |