Immigrants from Peru vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,318,003 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to an increase of 5.5 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 12.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,329 compared to $87,760, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($56,384 compared to $51,333, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,871 compared to $39,894, a difference of 0.060%), median earnings ($47,025 compared to $45,641, a difference of 3.0%), and median male earnings ($54,695 compared to $51,836, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 23.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 5.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.74%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.0%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.31 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.76%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 44.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 8.3%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.1%).