Immigrants from Peru vs Immigrants from Moldova Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,274,152 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Immigrants from Moldova. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to an increase of 57.2 Immigrants from Moldova.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($54,695 compared to $59,417, a difference of 8.6%), per capita income ($43,852 compared to $47,489, a difference of 8.3%), and median earnings ($47,025 compared to $50,274, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,384 compared to $56,168, a difference of 0.38%), householder income over 65 years ($61,988 compared to $62,939, a difference of 1.5%), and median household income ($89,010 compared to $91,446, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.88%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.66%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.9%), births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 16.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.23%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.31 compared to 3.18, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 17.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.6%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and master's degree (14.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.74%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.2%).