Immigrants from Peru vs Chickasaw GED/Equivalency
COMPARE
Immigrants from Peru
Chickasaw
GED/Equivalency
GED/Equivalency Comparison
Immigrants from Peru
Chickasaw
84.2%
GED/EQUIVALENCY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
83.8%
GED/EQUIVALENCY
1.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Peru vs Chickasaw GED/Equivalency Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,860,880 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru and percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.020 and weighted average of 84.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,505 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 83.8%, a difference of 0.44%.
GED/Equivalency Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Peru | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 58.5% | 70.4% |
| Maximum | 97.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 39.5% | 29.6% |
| Mean | 83.9% | 81.5% |
| Median | 84.6% | 81.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 81.3% | 78.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 87.4% | 84.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Peru and Chickasaw by GED/Equivalency
In terms of ged/equivalency, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Peru are Immigrants from Bahamas (84.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (84.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (84.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Ghanaian (84.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (84.3%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Senegal (83.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (83.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ghana (83.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Blackfeet (83.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Crow (83.8%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | GED/Equivalency |
| Immigrants | South America | 4.2 /100 | #232 | Tragic 84.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 84.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 3.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 84.3% |
| Ghanaians | 3.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 84.3% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 3.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 84.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 3.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 84.2% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 84.2% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 2.6 /100 | #239 | Tragic 84.2% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 84.1% |
| Senegalese | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 84.0% |
| Sri Lankans | 1.9 /100 | #242 | Tragic 84.0% |
| Cherokee | 1.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 83.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 83.9% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.2 /100 | #245 | Tragic 83.8% |
| Chickasaw | 1.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 83.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 1.1 /100 | #247 | Tragic 83.8% |
| Blackfeet | 1.1 /100 | #248 | Tragic 83.8% |
| Crow | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 83.8% |
| Shoshone | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 83.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.8 /100 | #251 | Tragic 83.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 83.6% |