Immigrants from Peru vs Immigrants from the Azores Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,481,348 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Immigrants from the Azores. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to an increase of 40.9 Immigrants from the Azores.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,988 compared to $52,121, a difference of 18.9%), median household income ($89,010 compared to $80,357, a difference of 10.8%), and per capita income ($43,852 compared to $39,608, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,695 compared to $53,503, a difference of 2.2%), median earnings ($47,025 compared to $45,812, a difference of 2.6%), and median female earnings ($39,871 compared to $38,573, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 36.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 23.7%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.88%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 22.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 24.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (67.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 55.7%), master's degree (14.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 45.8%), and bachelor's degree (37.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.53%), 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and 2nd grade (97.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 79.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 45.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 8.0%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.2%).