Immigrants from Peru vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,109,367 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to a decrease of 24.8 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,852 compared to $53,806, a difference of 22.7%), median male earnings ($54,695 compared to $66,903, a difference of 22.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,329 compared to $118,056, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,384 compared to $57,123, a difference of 1.3%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,988 compared to $69,872, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 29.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.6%), births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 27.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.31 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.8%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (67.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 18.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 70.8%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 49.2%), and master's degree (14.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.17%), 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 22.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.93%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.6%).