Immigrants from Peru vs Immigrants from Philippines Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,384,579 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.211. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.057% in Immigrants from Philippines. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to a decrease of 57.5 Immigrants from Philippines.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,988 compared to $66,161, a difference of 6.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,329 compared to $102,910, a difference of 5.7%), and median household income ($89,010 compared to $93,899, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($43,852 compared to $44,000, a difference of 0.34%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and median male earnings ($54,695 compared to $55,809, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.15%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.88%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.3%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.27%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.94%), and family households (67.2% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 34.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 33.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 12.8%), master's degree (14.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (94.9% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and 6th grade (96.2% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.35%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.85%), and female disability (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.4%).