Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,527,060 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Kazakhstan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kazakhstan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.109% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kazakhstan corresponds to an increase of 109.4 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,747 compared to $39,558, a difference of 23.2%), median male earnings ($59,278 compared to $49,711, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,727 compared to $88,018, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,990 compared to $54,000, a difference of 0.020%), householder income over 65 years ($62,292 compared to $60,748, a difference of 2.5%), and wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 40.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 34.9%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 79.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 61.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 73.8%), births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 36.2%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.8% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (63.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 33.4%), no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 28.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.6% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 58.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 57.4%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.0% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.13%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.9% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and 11th grade (93.1% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 173.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 52.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.1%).