Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,418,339 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Immigrant from Kazakhstan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.332. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kazakhstan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 3.874% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kazakhstan corresponds to a decrease of 3,874.3 Hispanics or Latinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,747 compared to $35,688, a difference of 36.6%), median family income ($110,137 compared to $85,647, a difference of 28.6%), and median male earnings ($59,278 compared to $46,419, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 4.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,990 compared to $50,279, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,292 compared to $52,832, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 42.6%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 42.4%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.7%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.9%), and births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.8% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 3.1%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and family households (63.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 49.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 38.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.6% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 73.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 72.4%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 21.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.7%), female disability (11.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 6.1%).