Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Immigrants from Guyana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,088,768 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana within Immigrant from Kazakhstan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kazakhstan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Guyana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kazakhstan corresponds to an increase of 2.9 Immigrants from Guyana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 41.8%), per capita income ($48,747 compared to $40,742, a difference of 19.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,378 compared to $90,186, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,990 compared to $55,726, a difference of 3.2%), median female earnings ($42,386 compared to $40,773, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,292 compared to $56,495, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 52.0%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 31.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 41.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 38.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 29.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.95%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 35.1%), births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 24.3%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.36%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (63.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 117.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 62.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.6% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 22.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.6% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 47.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 54.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 70.0%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 49.8%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.7%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.75%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.2%).