Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Immigrants from Peru Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,667,463 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru within Immigrant from Kazakhstan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.248. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kazakhstan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.130% in Immigrants from Peru. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kazakhstan corresponds to a decrease of 129.5 Immigrants from Peru.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,747 compared to $43,852, a difference of 11.2%), median male earnings ($59,278 compared to $54,695, a difference of 8.4%), and median earnings ($50,225 compared to $47,025, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,292 compared to $61,988, a difference of 0.49%), median household income ($91,015 compared to $89,010, a difference of 2.2%), and wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 19.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.080%), poverty (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.87%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.9%), and births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.8% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (47.4% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 18.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.6% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.7%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.7%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 15.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.56%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.2%).