Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Chickasaw
12.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
96.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,184,903 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.440 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 33.4%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Kazakhstan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.41% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 52.9% | 67.9% |
Range | 52.5% | 63.9% |
Mean | 17.1% | 25.6% |
Median | 13.3% | 23.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 31.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Immigrants from Armenia (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Europe (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Cuba (12.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 97.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 96.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 96.7 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Jordanians | 95.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 95.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iraqis | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Ugandans | 94.5 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 93.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |