Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,792,506 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Kazakhstan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.017. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kazakhstan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kazakhstan corresponds to an increase of 8.4 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,292 compared to $69,774, a difference of 12.0%), median family income ($110,137 compared to $122,764, a difference of 11.5%), and median household income ($91,015 compared to $100,711, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,990 compared to $55,932, a difference of 3.6%), median female earnings ($42,386 compared to $45,323, a difference of 6.9%), and wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother poverty (28.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.6%), births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.32%), family households (63.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.8%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.9%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.9%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.19%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.3%).