Czech vs Hungarian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,060,960 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.200. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Hungarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 13.7 Hungarians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $50,247, a difference of 2.3%), per capita income ($44,595 compared to $45,426, a difference of 1.9%), and median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $57,309, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($105,839 compared to $105,609, a difference of 0.22%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $103,913, a difference of 0.39%), and wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 32.1%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 19.6%), and family poverty (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 0.46%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.7%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.6%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.24%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 44.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.7%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.1%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.42%).