Czech vs Pennsylvania German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,680,714 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.358. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Pennsylvania Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 62.1 Pennsylvania Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,595 compared to $37,842, a difference of 17.8%), householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $52,888, a difference of 15.8%), and median family income ($105,839 compared to $91,763, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $50,852, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and median earnings ($47,221 compared to $42,615, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 27.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and female poverty (11.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 41.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 11.4%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.9% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 0.58%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 59.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.77%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 47.1%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 37.2%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.9%).