Czech vs Immigrants from Moldova Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,505,475 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.076% in Immigrants from Moldova. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 75.9 Immigrants from Moldova.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 11.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $56,168, a difference of 9.2%), and median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $42,304, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $62,939, a difference of 2.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $107,357, a difference of 3.7%), and median family income ($105,839 compared to $109,975, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 21.3%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 18.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 11.9%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and married-couple households (49.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.0%), family households (64.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 42.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.2%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.56%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 35.4%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), female disability (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.88%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.1%).