Czech vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 187,079,523 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 32.3 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 30.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $87,760, a difference of 10.0%), and median family income ($105,839 compared to $96,544, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $51,333, a difference of 0.17%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $39,894, a difference of 2.3%), and median earnings ($47,221 compared to $45,641, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 53.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 47.2%), and family poverty (7.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.65%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father poverty (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 39.6%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 36.8%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 41.4%), married-couple households (49.4% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 18.3%), and currently married (49.9% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.7%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 141.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 42.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 11.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 29.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 39.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 74.6%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 37.0%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 27.3%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.82%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.7%).