Czech vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income
COMPARE
Czech
Chickasaw
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
Czechs
Chickasaw
$44,595
PER CAPITA INCOME
74.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
$36,475
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,845,584 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.233 and weighted average of $44,595. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475, a difference of 22.3%.
Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | $14,339 | $10,758 |
| Maximum | $58,093 | $42,047 |
| Range | $43,754 | $31,289 |
| Mean | $36,126 | $28,009 |
| Median | $36,098 | $27,826 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $31,633 | $24,362 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $40,288 | $31,977 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | $8,655 | $7,616 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | $7,126 | $5,659 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | $7,100 | $5,624 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Armenia ($44,552, a difference of 0.10%), Korean ($44,522, a difference of 0.16%), Irish ($44,679, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Eritrea ($44,509, a difference of 0.19%), and Norwegian ($44,480, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 82.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent $45,066 |
| Slavs | 82.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent $45,049 |
| Ugandans | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent $45,047 |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 82.5 /100 | #143 | Excellent $45,043 |
| Icelanders | 81.6 /100 | #144 | Excellent $44,987 |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 78.0 /100 | #145 | Good $44,790 |
| Irish | 75.8 /100 | #146 | Good $44,679 |
| Czechs | 74.1 /100 | #147 | Good $44,595 |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 73.1 /100 | #148 | Good $44,552 |
| Koreans | 72.5 /100 | #149 | Good $44,522 |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 72.1 /100 | #150 | Good $44,509 |
| Norwegians | 71.5 /100 | #151 | Good $44,480 |
| Peruvians | 71.5 /100 | #152 | Good $44,479 |
| Scottish | 70.6 /100 | #153 | Good $44,440 |
| Portuguese | 68.7 /100 | #154 | Good $44,362 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Inupiat | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic $36,999 |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $36,849 |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $36,823 |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $36,690 |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $36,665 |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $36,651 |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $36,631 |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic $36,475 |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic $36,427 |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic $36,180 |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic $36,112 |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic $35,999 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic $35,922 |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic $35,897 |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic $35,720 |