Sudanese vs Immigrants from South America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,455,729 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America within Sudanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.373. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sudanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.207% in Immigrants from South America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sudanese corresponds to a decrease of 207.2 Immigrants from South America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($46,982 compared to $54,268, a difference of 15.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,401 compared to $94,042, a difference of 11.4%), and median household income ($78,529 compared to $85,611, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,281 compared to $59,151, a difference of 1.5%), wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and median female earnings ($38,215 compared to $39,643, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 28.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.40%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 28.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.4% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in family households (60.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 9.4%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.3%), births to unmarried women (32.4% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 14.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.0%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and college, under 1 year (66.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and cognitive disability (18.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.6%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.8%).