Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from South America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,127,290 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from South America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 3.4 Immigrants from South America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $44,068, a difference of 32.4%), median household income ($67,879 compared to $85,611, a difference of 26.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $94,042, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 0.21%), householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $59,151, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $54,268, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 62.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (20.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 52.1%), and family poverty (14.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 28.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 52.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 52.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 40.7%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 34.5%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.27, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 57.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 36.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.2%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 56.8%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 55.8%), and bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.14%), 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and 10th grade (92.2% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 59.2%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 58.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.4%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.6%).