Pima vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,903,910 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.397. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.034% in Immigrants from Eastern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 34.2 Immigrants from Eastern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $49,316, a difference of 60.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $109,335, a difference of 49.0%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $93,051, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,572, a difference of 7.9%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $43,309, a difference of 22.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $62,693, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 133.9%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 126.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 111.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 7.3%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 41.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 55.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 155.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 122.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 121.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 109.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 86.7%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.87%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 26.7%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.53%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 90.0%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 83.1%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 66.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 77.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 64.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 14.2%).