Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,369,297 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.032% in Immigrants from Eastern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 31.8 Immigrants from Eastern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $55,572, a difference of 10.3%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $43,309, a difference of 8.6%), and median earnings ($47,640 compared to $51,624, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $62,693, a difference of 2.8%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $109,335, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.8%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 18.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.74%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 18.2%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 26.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.0%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.56%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.66%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 153.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 9.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.8%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 14.5%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%), college, 1 year or more (62.1% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.49%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.9%).