Carpatho Rusyn vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,107,498 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.420. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.648% in Immigrants from Eastern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to a decrease of 647.5 Immigrants from Eastern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $55,572, a difference of 13.2%), median household income ($86,635 compared to $93,051, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,777 compared to $109,335, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,093 compared to $62,693, a difference of 2.6%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and per capita income ($47,248 compared to $49,316, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.0%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 12.1%), family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (47.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.06 compared to 3.17, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 27.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and ged/equivalency (89.1% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (67.9% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 0.010%), college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and associate's degree (50.6% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.9%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.1%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.9%).