Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,325,361 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.014. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs corresponds to an increase of 4.6 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (31.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 37.9%), householder income under 25 years ($65,329 compared to $53,722, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,201 compared to $91,462, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,159 compared to $38,644, a difference of 1.3%), median earnings ($48,304 compared to $44,462, a difference of 8.6%), and per capita income ($45,195 compared to $41,195, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 52.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 50.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (9.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 28.5%), single female poverty (17.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 30.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 30.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 41.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and female unemployment (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 23.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (22.0% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 53.6%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 52.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (68.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 241.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 68.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 22.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 49.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 62.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 25.8%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 18.9%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 34.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.4%).