French American Indian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,408,111 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.243% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 243.2 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 12.8%), householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $53,722, a difference of 9.7%), and median household income ($76,387 compared to $80,341, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($92,872 compared to $92,837, a difference of 0.040%), median male earnings ($50,611 compared to $50,474, a difference of 0.27%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $54,030, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 25.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.48%), male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and poverty (13.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.0%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 28.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 11.7%), births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.1% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 2.8%), family households (62.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 128.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 61.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 17.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 50.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 46.0%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and master's degree (12.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (42.0% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 0.54%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 45.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 42.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.4%).