Immigrants from Kenya vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,056,864 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from Kenya communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kenya within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.123% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kenya corresponds to an increase of 123.2 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,710 compared to $54,030, a difference of 10.5%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and median family income ($100,679 compared to $92,837, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,767 compared to $89,673, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($39,535 compared to $38,644, a difference of 2.3%), and median household income ($83,068 compared to $80,341, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 38.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 36.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.58%), single female poverty (21.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 30.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.2%), births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households (62.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.67%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (44.1% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 147.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 40.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 18.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 36.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 40.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.8%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 35.6%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.26%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.76%).