Celtic vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,575,907 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.772. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.966% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 966.1 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 21.3%), householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $54,030, a difference of 12.2%), and median family income ($101,139 compared to $92,837, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $38,644, a difference of 0.94%), median earnings ($45,732 compared to $44,462, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $89,673, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 46.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 46.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.76%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.0%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 33.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.6%), currently married (47.8% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 195.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 67.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 20.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 46.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 61.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 89.0%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 33.9%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 50.4%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 49.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.65%).