Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Immigrants from Ecuador
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Immigrants from Ecuador
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,998,266 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $50,474, a difference of 36.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,188 compared to $91,462, a difference of 35.8%), and median family income ($125,956 compared to $92,837, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $53,722, a difference of 7.6%), median female earnings ($46,324 compared to $38,644, a difference of 19.9%), and per capita income ($52,660 compared to $41,195, a difference of 27.8%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Ecuador |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,660 | Tragic $41,195 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,956 | Tragic $92,837 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $106,057 | Tragic $80,341 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $57,114 | Tragic $44,462 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $68,960 | Tragic $50,474 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,324 | Poor $38,644 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,818 | Exceptional $53,722 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $116,626 | Tragic $89,673 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $124,188 | Tragic $91,462 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $70,103 | Tragic $54,030 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.3% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 70.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 56.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.9%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.8%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Ecuador |
| Poverty | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.3% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 11.1% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.3% | Tragic 12.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 15.6% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.6% | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 14.6% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 19.4% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 19.3% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Excellent 12.5% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 17.8% | Tragic 22.0% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.5% | Average 16.3% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 25.3% | Tragic 31.3% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.7% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.8%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.9%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Ecuador |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
| Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
| Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.4% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 20.9% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.4% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Excellent 8.5% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Poor 7.9% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 10.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Ecuador |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Poor 79.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.6% | Tragic 31.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.0% | Tragic 72.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 84.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 84.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Poor 84.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 82.2% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 36.7%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 36.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.5%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (30.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.4%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Ecuador |
| Family Households | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 30.0% | Excellent 27.7% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.6% | Tragic 42.9% |
| Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.32 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Poor 2.4% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.3% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 50.0% | Tragic 43.2% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.4% | Excellent 11.8% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 33.7% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 178.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 20.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 39.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 44.3%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Ecuador |
| No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 23.8% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.5% | Tragic 76.2% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.6% | Tragic 40.5% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Tragic 4.2% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 86.6%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 55.0%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Ecuador |
| No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Tragic 3.1% |
| Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
| Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
| 1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
| 2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
| 3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Tragic 96.6% |
| 4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Tragic 96.2% |
| 5th Grade | Good 97.5% | Tragic 95.8% |
| 6th Grade | Good 97.2% | Tragic 95.3% |
| 7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Tragic 93.7% |
| 8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Tragic 93.3% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 91.8% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Tragic 90.4% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 89.1% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 87.5% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 84.8% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.4% | Tragic 81.0% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 72.1% | Tragic 58.7% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 53.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.7% | Tragic 42.2% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.3% | Tragic 34.7% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.7% | Tragic 13.6% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 3.8% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Ecuador |
| Disability | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.5% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.6% | Fair 23.7% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.0% | Average 47.4% |
| Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.3% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Good 17.2% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 6.1% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |