Scottish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,663,622 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 18.5 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 29.6%), householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $54,030, a difference of 14.3%), and median family income ($104,288 compared to $92,837, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $38,644, a difference of 0.64%), median earnings ($46,463 compared to $44,462, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,622 compared to $89,673, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 58.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 57.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.89%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 34.9%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 35.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 27.6%), married-couple households (49.0% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and currently married (49.2% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.49%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 252.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 75.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 22.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 51.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 68.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 118.2%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 40.8%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 50.9%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 47.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 0.66%), and disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.5%).