Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,533,638 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to an increase of 2.7 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $54,030, a difference of 20.8%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $92,837, a difference of 18.6%), and per capita income ($34,910 compared to $41,195, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.58%), householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $53,722, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,662 compared to $91,462, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 38.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 24.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.030%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 39.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 28.7%), births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 22.9%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.7% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 173.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 39.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 19.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 33.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 36.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 25.1%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.3% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (93.2% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 12th grade, no diploma (87.5% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and 7th grade (93.8% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 10.6%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.56%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.0%).