British West Indian vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,857,379 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.228. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.076% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to a decrease of 76.1 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 24.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,571 compared to $91,462, a difference of 6.9%), and median household income ($75,647 compared to $80,341, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($44,552 compared to $44,462, a difference of 0.20%), median male earnings ($49,636 compared to $50,474, a difference of 1.7%), and per capita income ($40,330 compared to $41,195, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 18.9%), male poverty (14.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and family poverty (12.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.5% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 0.52%), single female poverty (22.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and female unemployment (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.2%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and married-couple households (38.3% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.050%), family households (62.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 24.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and college, 1 year or more (54.5% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.0%), disability age under 5 (0.99% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.5%).