Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,424,534 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.157. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to a decrease of 23.6 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,217 compared to $54,030, a difference of 11.5%), wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and median family income ($99,840 compared to $92,837, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,810 compared to $38,644, a difference of 0.43%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,337 compared to $89,673, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($45,598 compared to $44,462, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 32.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 31.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (22.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.28%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 24.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.39%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.0%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and currently married (45.4% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 150.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 62.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 18.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 39.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 53.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 30.4%), no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.62%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.8%).