Cherokee vs Cajun 2nd Grade
COMPARE
Cherokee
Cajun
2nd Grade
2nd Grade Comparison
Cherokee
Cajuns
98.3%
2ND GRADE
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
76th/ 347
METRIC RANK
98.3%
2ND GRADE
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Cajun 2nd Grade Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,719,253 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336 and weighted average of 98.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,712,957 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%.

2nd Grade Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Cajun |
Minimum | 95.9% | 89.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 4.1% | 10.3% |
Mean | 99.2% | 98.3% |
Median | 99.2% | 98.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 98.6% | 98.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 99.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.80% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.80% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Cajuns by 2nd Grade
In terms of 2nd grade, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Shoshone (98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Netherlands (98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Belgium (98.2%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Cheyenne (98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Chickasaw (98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (98.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (98.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and Russian (98.3%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2nd Grade |
Immigrants | North America | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 98.3% |
New Zealanders | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Canadians | 99.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Serbians | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Chickasaw | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Cheyenne | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Cajuns | 99.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Shoshone | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Cherokee | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Immigrants | England | 99.4 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 98.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 98.2% |
Osage | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 98.2% |
Icelanders | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 98.2% |
Delaware | 99.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 98.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.1 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 98.2% |
Hopi | 99.1 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 98.2% |