Native/Alaskan vs Thai Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 442,875,047 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Thais within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Thais. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 7.4 Thais.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Thai communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $54,307, a difference of 63.2%), median household income ($67,879 compared to $110,648, a difference of 63.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $129,560, a difference of 62.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 24.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $59,187, a difference of 24.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $72,099, a difference of 38.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Thai communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 113.3%), receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 112.9%), and married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 108.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 41.8%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 49.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 49.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Thai communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 84.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 82.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 74.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Thai communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Thai communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 78.9%), single father households (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.22, a difference of 7.1%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Thai communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.2%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Thai communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 118.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 108.8%), and professional degree (3.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 107.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Thai communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 83.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 78.5%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 70.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 12.6%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.8%).