Ute vs Moroccan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Moroccan
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Moroccans

Fair
Fair
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,626
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
215th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Moroccan Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,818,673 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.226% in Moroccans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 225.9 Moroccans.
Ute Integration in Moroccan Communities

Ute vs Moroccan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $45,854, a difference of 25.1%), median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $41,872, a difference of 19.8%), and median household income ($72,402 compared to $86,468, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $53,256, a difference of 6.5%), householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $59,683, a difference of 12.7%), and median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $56,499, a difference of 15.5%).
Ute vs Moroccan Income
Income MetricUteMoroccan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Exceptional
$45,854
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Good
$104,488
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Good
$86,468
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Exceptional
$48,838
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Excellent
$56,499
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Exceptional
$41,872
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Exceptional
$53,256
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Good
$96,117
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Average
$100,138
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Fair
$59,683
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
24.0%

Ute vs Moroccan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (28.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 35.5%), male poverty (16.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 34.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.0%).
Ute vs Moroccan Poverty
Poverty MetricUteMoroccan
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Fair
13.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
18.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Fair
29.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
12.8%

Ute vs Moroccan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Ute vs Moroccan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteMoroccan
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
18.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
10.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.9%

Ute vs Moroccan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 4.6%).
Ute vs Moroccan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteMoroccan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Poor
35.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Poor
82.5%

Ute vs Moroccan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.3%), average family size (3.49 compared to 3.22, a difference of 8.2%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (44.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 3.8%).
Ute vs Moroccan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteMoroccan
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Tragic
61.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Average
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Tragic
44.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Average
31.8%

Ute vs Moroccan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 78.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 42.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 26.5%).
Ute vs Moroccan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteMoroccan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
14.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
85.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Tragic
48.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Tragic
15.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
4.9%

Ute vs Moroccan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 43.1%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 30.9%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.060%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
Ute vs Moroccan Education Level
Education Level MetricUteMoroccan
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Poor
97.3%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Good
60.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Excellent
48.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
40.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%

Ute vs Moroccan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 38.7%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.4%).
Ute vs Moroccan Disability
Disability MetricUteMoroccan
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Fair
2.5%