Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Marshallese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,026,889 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Immigrant from Dominican Republic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Dominican Republic within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Dominican Republic corresponds to an increase of 12.0 Marshallese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($45,758 compared to $65,874, a difference of 44.0%), median family income ($81,233 compared to $95,293, a difference of 17.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,836 compared to $90,455, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,204 compared to $50,627, a difference of 0.84%), median earnings ($41,554 compared to $41,969, a difference of 1.0%), and median female earnings ($36,857 compared to $36,459, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (20.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 86.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (18.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 79.3%), and married-couple family poverty (8.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.8%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and single female poverty (25.3% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 60.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 27.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 49.9%), married-couple households (37.3% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 19.5%), and currently married (38.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.67%), average family size (3.35 compared to 3.38, a difference of 0.79%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (31.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 220.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 149.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 104.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (68.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 31.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (33.2% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 65.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 104.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 71.9%), college, under 1 year (54.0% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 14.7%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 55.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 21.4%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.3% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 0.44%), female disability (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.9%).