Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Marshallese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,652,924 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Marshallese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,283 compared to $83,575, a difference of 20.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,109 compared to $90,455, a difference of 17.3%), and median household income ($91,541 compared to $78,930, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,089 compared to $65,874, a difference of 2.8%), wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,714 compared to $50,627, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 43.7%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 27.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and female poverty (12.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 34.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 33.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 14.5%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.38, a difference of 0.68%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.70%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.97%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 46.5%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 20.7%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.90%), 2nd grade (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.96%), and nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 28.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 22.4%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 2.9%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.1%).