Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 499,440,833 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Americans within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.262. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 22.6 Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and American communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $84,791, a difference of 39.2%), median household income ($104,796 compared to $75,932, a difference of 38.0%), and per capita income ($53,806 compared to $39,039, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $48,860, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $55,527, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and American communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 51.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 45.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 46.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 34.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 25.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and American communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 45.4%), divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 29.2%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.50%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 77.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and American communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 93.6%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 84.2%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 69.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and 10th grade (93.6% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and American communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 82.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 58.4%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.9%).