Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Jordan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Jordan

Hmong

Excellent
Average
9,031
SOCIAL INDEX
87.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
33rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Jordan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,058,670 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.681. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.184% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 183.7 Hmong.
Immigrants from Jordan Integration in Hmong Communities

Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $88,115, a difference of 20.5%), median male earnings ($57,145 compared to $48,254, a difference of 18.4%), and per capita income ($45,066 compared to $38,120, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $49,364, a difference of 4.1%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $56,339, a difference of 11.9%).
Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from JordanHmong
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,066
Tragic
$38,120
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,715
Tragic
$91,296
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,412
Tragic
$75,839
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,673
Tragic
$42,111
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,145
Tragic
$48,254
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,977
Tragic
$35,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,370
Tragic
$49,364
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,185
Tragic
$84,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,164
Tragic
$88,115
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$63,041
Tragic
$56,339
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (19.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 19.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 15.5%), and single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.6%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from JordanHmong
Poverty
Excellent
11.9%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Average
9.1%
Males
Good
10.8%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Fair
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.6%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Fair
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Poor
17.5%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.1%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.7%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 51.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from JordanHmong
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
13.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
9.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%

Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from JordanHmong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.9%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.1%
Tragic
81.7%

Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.9%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.22%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.64%).
Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from JordanHmong
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.7%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.0%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.4%).
Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from JordanHmong
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.9%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.5%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 26.6%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from JordanHmong
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Good
98.1%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Good
96.2%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Good
95.9%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.1%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
91.8%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.8%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.8%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.3%
Tragic
63.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
43.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.3%
Tragic
34.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 28.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 26.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.16%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from JordanHmong
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Excellent
2.4%